Re: Fixing typos in tests of partition_info.sql

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 06:35:03PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> As far as the information content of this comment is concerned, I think
> it'd be more useful to word this comment such that it is applicable to
> different functions than to word it such that it is applicable to
> different queries.  More opinions would be nice.

This argument is sensible.

> Okay, how about:
> 
> -- Various partitioning-related functions return NULL if passed relations
> -- of types that cannot be part of a partition tree; for example, views,
> -- materialized views, etc.

Okay, this suggestion sounds fine to me.  Thanks!
--
Michael