Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval
Дата
Msg-id
20180928052331.GI1500@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segment removal Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segment removal Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>
Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:40:26PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-09-28 12:28:27 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> While reviewing the archiving code, I have bumped into the fact that
>> XLogArchiveCleanup() thinks that it is safe to do only a plain unlink()
>> for .ready and .done files when removing a past segment.  I don't think
>> that it is a smart move, as on a subsequent crash we may still see
>> those, but the related segment would have gone away.  This is not really
>> a problem for .done files, but it could confuse the archiver to see some
>> .ready files about things that have already gone away.
> 
> Isn't that window fundamentally there anyway?

Sure.  However the point I would like to make is that if we have the
possibility to reduce this window, then we should.
--
Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
FAQ