Re: Typo in doc or wrong EXCLUDE implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Typo in doc or wrong EXCLUDE implementation
Дата
Msg-id 20180808130040.GA2611@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Typo in doc or wrong EXCLUDE implementation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: Typo in doc or wrong EXCLUDE implementation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug  8, 2018 at 01:55:53PM +0300, KES wrote:
> I do not know many internals and maybe wrong.
> 
> But from my point of view with my current knowledge. 
> If such exclusion constraint would be marked as UNIQUE we can use it for FK while implementing temporal/bi-temporal
tables.
> 
> And this will be simplify relationing while implementing them.

Yes, it would work, but doing that only for equality would be surprising
to many people because exclusion constraints are more general than
equality comparisons.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Negotiating the SCRAM channel binding type