On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 12:40:16PM +0200, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> On 3 August 2018 12:33:26 CEST, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> wrote:
>>Hm, a co-worker noticed that we have max_wal_size = 16GB, that might be
>>the
>>reason:-)
>
> Yes ;-)
Worth mentioning that this is a soft size, and not a hard size, hence
depending on your worload you may see more WAL segments than what is set
in 16GB. The docs mention that, so no need to be surprised.
--
Michael