Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key
Дата
Msg-id 20180711002943.mpmwjp544kyf4gwv@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Concurrency bug in UPDATE of partition-key  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-Jul-09, Amit Kapila wrote:

> Alvaro,
> 
> Can you please comment whether this addresses your concern?

I was thinking that it would be a matter of passing the tuple slot to
EvalPlanQual for it to fill, rather than requiring it to fill some other
slot obtained from who-knows-where, but I realize now that that's nigh
impossible.  Thanks for the explanation and patience.

What bothers me about this whole business is how ExecBRDeleteTriggers
and ExecDelete are now completely different from their sibling routines,
but maybe there's no helping that.

Please move the output arguments at the end of argument lists; also, it
would be great if you add commentary about ExecDelete other undocumented
arguments (tupleDeleted in particular) while you're in the vicinity.

Thanks

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: no partition pruning when partitioning using array type
Следующее
От: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?