Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info?
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info?
Дата
Msg-id
20180606125943.25yyr2g2oag3z4gr@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Why is fncollation in FunctionCallInfoData rather than fmgr_info? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 2018-06-05 17:11:17 -0400, Chapman Flack wrote: > On 06/05/2018 04:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > But we don't really change the > > collation of function invocations per-call. > > Is that true? (Not a rhetorical question; I'm unsure.) Yes, it is at the moment. > Is your argument that the expression's collation is determined once > for each call /site/, and thereafter doesn't change over repeated > invocations via any one call site, and a unique FmgrInfo is > populated at each call site? Yes, that's pretty much how it works. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата: