Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20180527200006.hbwa2h7nfuunmnza@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid
Re: found xmin from before relfrozenxid on pg_catalog.pg_authid |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-05-27 13:22:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> But I don't think there's any need for special magic here: we just
> have to accept the fact that there's a need to flush that cache
> sometimes. In normal use it shouldn't happen often enough to be a
> performance problem.
Yea, it's not that problematic. We already remove the local init
file. I started out trying to write a version of invalidation that also
WAL logs shared inval, but that turns out to be hard to do without
breaking compatibilty. So I think we should just always unlink the
shared one - that seems to work well.
> FWIW, I'm not on board with "memcpy the whole row". I think the right
> thing is more like what we do in RelationReloadIndexInfo, ie copy over
> the specific fields that we expect to be mutable.
But that's what RelationReloadIndexInfo() etc do?
relp = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(pg_class_tuple);
memcpy(relation->rd_rel, relp, CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE);
I don't think we need to modify anything outside of rd_rel at this
point?
I've a patch that seems to work, that mostly needs some comment
polishing.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: