Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Дата
Msg-id 20180503005200.htvxyvtxcdecpf4z@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms  (Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms  (Yuriy Zhuravlev <stalkerg@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2018-05-03 09:42:49 +0900, Yuriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> 2018-05-03 9:32 GMT+09:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
> > Given that you don't have feature parity this just seems like trolling.
> >
> 
> I have. I have some lacks with .po generation and documentation but all!
> other features same, I even can run tap tests.
> Look into my task issue list
> https://github.com/stalkerg/postgres_cmake/issues it's can increase number
> of lines maximum on 10%.

You detect like a third of the things that the old configure
detected. Most of the comments of converted tests are missing. The
thread safety check definitely aren't comparable. The int128 type checks
aren't comparable. No LLVM detection. The atomics check don't guard
against compilers that allow to reference undefined functions at compile
time.  That's like a 60s scan of what you have. Sorry, but comparing
lines at that state is just bullshit.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Следующее
От: Yuriy Zhuravlev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms