Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От hubert depesz lubaczewski
Тема Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Дата
Msg-id 20171127175631.GA405@depesz.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 05:24:49PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I think it is "actual_time * 1" for anything below Gather.

Well, I think I found another problem.

Please take a look at:
https://explain.depesz.com/s/Bs8c

Node 15 is Gather with loops = 2974 (because it was ran by nested loop).

There were 4 workers, so 5 threads working, but the loops on parallel
seq scan is 17.698 million ?!

The problem is that for explain.depesz.com I'm calculating how much time
pg actually spent doing given thing.

So, if an operation has actual time of 1ms, but 100 loops, it took
100ms.

In case of parallel operations it looks like I can't realistically find
the information anywhere?

In the explain above, we see that Nested loop took, in total, around
2 million miliseconds (step 9).
Out of which, ~ 7000 ms was hash join and it's subnodes.
This leaves most of the time for Gather step, which was called 2974
times with actual time reported as 618ms.
2974 * 618 is 1837932 miliseconds, which seems reasonable.

But then - how much of this time was spent in Parallel Seq Scan in step
#16 ?

2974 * 609ms? Why is loops there 17 million?

Best regards,

depesz



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dean Rasheed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues forforeign tables
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Do we accept doc changes to back branches?