Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

On 2017-09-25 13:50:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund  writes:
> >> On 25/09/17 19:26, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> The problem with this type of argument is that it leads directly to the
> >>> conclusion that every feature users want must be in core.
> 
> > ... I don't think that should mean that there's no possible output
> > plugin that could/should be integrated into core.
> 
> Yeah, my point is just that the argument needs to be about why a
> *particular* plugin is valuable enough to justify adding it to the
> core developers' maintenance workload.

+1

Greetings,

Andres Freund


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers