Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow vacuums to report oldestxmin

Fujii Masao wrote:

> This is the evidence that no one cares about the details of VACUUM VERBOSE
> output example. So I'm tempted to simplify the example (please see the
> attached patch) instead of keeping updating the example.

Agreed.

> > If this patch is applied, it should back-patch to all supported
> > branches.
> 
> Not sure if it's worth back-patching that.

I see no reason to keep it in back branches either.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services