Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages?
От
Andres Freund
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages?
Дата
Msg-id
20170204013446.6jkapurcf6f3tnlm@alap3.anarazel.de
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? (Jim Nasby)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages? David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
On 2017-02-03 19:26:55 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 2/3/17 6:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > - The ringbuffers in shared buffers can be problematic. One possible way of > > > solving that is to get rid of ringbuffers entirely and rely on different > > > initial values for usage_count instead, but that's not desirable if it just > > > means more clock sweep work for backends. > > I'm not quite sure which ringbuffer you're referring to here? If to the > > new one, why is it problematic? > > No, I mean the non-default BufferAccessStrategy's. That's not a ringbuffer that's a buffer ring ;)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата: