* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> And I think that's all pretty reasonable. I don't consider this a
> done deal yet. I don't consider your -1 irrelevant. But I don't
> think it's fair to present this as if I am somehow running roughshod
> over community process, either. If a large crew of people show up to
> insist that we should rename only the directories and nothing else, I
> guess I'll have to live with that. But I think that's a bad decision
> that will never survive the passage of time, and there seem to be
> several people who agree with me.
+1 (to the above, and the rest of Robert's comments on that email).
For my 2c, I'm also in the crowd of forward or back, but don't leave it
half-done. My preference is certainly to move forward with these
changes, but I understand the process and if there's enough agreement
that we just shouldn't make these changes, then we really shouldn't make
any of them.
Thanks!
Stephen