More WITH

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема More WITH
Дата
Msg-id 20150817171833.GB32300@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: More WITH  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Folks,

In the interest of consistency, which is to say, of not hitting
barriers that are essentially implementation details, I'd like to
propose that we allow the rest of the row-returning commands inside
WITH clauses.  We currently have:

SELECT
VALUES
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE ... RETURNING

We don't yet have:

EXPLAIN [ANALYZE]
SHOW
FETCH

A little further out there, although this would be an API change, we
might consider allowing the results of VACUUM and ANALYZE as row sets,
which would also be good to wrap in WITH.

Is there a good reason, or more than one, why we shouldn't have all
the row-returning commands in WITH?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: More WITH