Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory
Дата
Msg-id
20150514000719.GA15031@momjian.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory "Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo.tech@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory "Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo.tech@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory "Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo.tech@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory "Hugo <Nabble>" <hugo.tech@gmail.com>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:23:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:10:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Bruce Momjian writes: > >>> Is there a reason the following patch wasn't applied? > > >> I don't think anybody ever did the legwork to verify it was a good idea. > >> In particular, it'd be good to check if sending a tabstat message for each > >> table adds noticeable overhead. > > > OK, I will mark it as closed then. Thanks. > > I don't know that it should be closed exactly --- if we don't do this, > we should do something else about the performance issue. Maybe put it > on TODO? Thanks, TODO added: Reduce memory use when analyzing many tables (This is part of my clean up of old issues in preparation for 9.5 feature freeze.) -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. +
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления