Re: Parallel Seq Scan
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20150109213422.GJ3062@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Parallel Seq Scan (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Parallel Seq Scan
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Stefan Kaltenbrunner (stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc) wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 08:01 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Now, for debugging purposes, I could see such a parameter being
> > available but it should default to 'off/never-fail'.
>
> not sure what it really would be useful for - if I execute a query I
> would truely expect it to get answered - if it can be made faster if
> done in parallel thats nice but why would I want it to fail?
I was thinking for debugging only, though I'm not really sure why you'd
need it if you get a NOTICE when you don't end up with all the workers
you expect.
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: