On 2014-11-08 11:52:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adding a similar
> level of burden to support a feature with a narrow use-case seems like
> a nonstarter from here.
I don't understand this statement. In my experience the lack of a usable
replication solution that allows temporary tables and major version
differences is one of the most, if not *the* most, frequent criticisms
of postgres I hear. How is this a narrow use case?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services