Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables
Дата
Msg-id 20141009211125.GI29124@awork2.int
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2014-10-09 18:03:00 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > I agree this is a serious problem.  We have discussed various options,
> > but have not decided on anything.  The TODO list has:
> > 
> >     https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
> > 
> >     Improve setting of visibility map bits for read-only and insert-only
> >     workloads
> >     
> >       http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130906001437.GA29264@momjian.us
> 
> I hate to repeat myself, but I think autovacuum could be modified to run
> actions other than vacuum and analyze.  In this specific case we could
> be running a table scan that checks only pages that don't have the
> all-visible bit set, and see if it can be set.

Isn't that *precisely* what a plain vacuum run does?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deferring some AtStart* allocations?
Следующее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Autovacuum fails to keep visibility map up-to-date in mostly-insert-only-tables