Re: open items for 9.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: open items for 9.4
Дата
Msg-id 20140929183001.GA14400@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: open items for 9.4  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: open items for 9.4
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2014-09-29 11:28:07 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 09/29/2014 08:53 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> - Remove xloginsert_slots/xloginsert_locks GUC - Not yet!!
> >> > 
> >> > The text seems to indicate that there's some disagreement on this
> >> > point.  I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not to keep the
> >> > GUC, but if we're going to remove it it should probably happen before
> >> > beta3.  It's going to be impossible to remove once we've released with
> >> > it, I suspect.
> > I vote for keeping it.
> 
> Time for me to put on my "we have too many darned GUCs" curmudgeon hat.
> 
> 1. What does it do?

Change scalability in write heavy loads.

> 2. Are there reasons why users would want to change it from the
> default?

Yes, to improve scalability.

> 3. Can we explain those reasons in the form of documentation?

Yes. Try and benchmark it. It'll be hardware and workload dependant.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: open items for 9.4