Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter
Дата
Msg-id 20140828135340.GN7046@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier wrote:

> This remark is just to limit the amount of trash in the database used
> for regression tests. But then if we'd remove everything we would lack
> handy material for tests on utilities like database-wide thingies of
> the type VACUUM, REINDEX, pg_dump, etc. And we can just drop the
> database used for regressions to clean up everything. So that's not
> mandatory at all. I tend to always clean up objects in my patches
> touching regressions to limit interactions with other tests, but I
> guess that's up to the person who wrote the code to decide.

Leaving lingering objects is not a bad thing, particularly if they have
unusual properties; they enable somebody pg_dump'ing the database which
can be a good test for pg_dump.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David G Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why data of timestamptz does not store value of timezone passed to it?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: re-reading SSL certificates during server reload