Re: WAL log level compatibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: WAL log level compatibility
Дата
Msg-id 20140822192659.GB21131@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на WAL log level compatibility  (Andy Lau <alau@infer.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:26:39PM +0000, Andy Lau wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Are 'wal_level = archive' vs 'wal_level = hot_standby' ok to mix? For example,
> let's say I had a PostgreSQL database running and creating WAL logs in the
> archive level. Then we switch to the hot standby level to support a hot
> standby, then go back to the archive level, all while uploading WAL logs to the
> same location. Would PostgreSQL be able to do PITR over this entire span of
> time?

Yes, PITR needs any wal_level other than "minimal".

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: deadlock in single-row select-for-update + update scenario? How could it happen?
Следующее
От: Brodie S
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ERROR: Problem running post install step