Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140227143436.GN4759@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem? (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a
known MultiXact problem?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-02-26 18:18:05 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > > static void
> > > heap_xlog_lock(XLogRecPtr lsn, XLogRecord *record)
> > > {
> > > ...
> > > HeapTupleHeaderClearHotUpdated(htup);
> > > HeapTupleHeaderSetXmax(htup, xlrec->locking_xid);
> > > HeapTupleHeaderSetCmax(htup, FirstCommandId, false);
> > > /* Make sure there is no forward chain link in t_ctid */
> > > htup->t_ctid = xlrec->target.tid;
> > > ...
> > > }
> >
> > I think the fix is to reset HOT_UPDATED and t_ctid only if the infomask
> > says the tuple is LOCKED_ONLY, per the attached patch.
>
> Looks good to me.
Thanks, pushed.
Greg, Peter, if you could update your standbys to the current HEAD of
REL9_3_STABLE for the affected apps and verify the problem no longer
shows up in a reasonable timeframe, it would be great. (I'm assuming
you saw this happen repeatedly.)
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: