Re: issue with gininsert under very high load
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: issue with gininsert under very high load |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20140213235343.GF4910@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: issue with gininsert under very high load (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-13 18:49:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2014-02-13 16:15:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Something like the attached? Can somebody who's seen this problem confirm > >> this improves matters? > > > Hm. Won't that possiby lead to the fast tuple list growing unboundedly? > > I think we would need to at least need to stop using the fast tuple > > mechanism during gininsert() if it's already too big and do plain > > inserts. > > No, because we've already got a process working on cleaning it out. Well, appending to the fast tuple list will normally be fully cached io, cleaning it up not so much. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: