On 2013-09-23 13:47:05 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund escribió:
> > On 2013-09-20 14:15:23 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > > I have a little bit of feedback that I forgot to mention in my earlier
> > > reviews, because I thought it was too trivial then: something about
> > > the name pg_receivellog annoys me in a way that the name
> > > pg_receivexlog does not. Specifically, it looks like someone meant to
> > > type pg_receivelog but fat-fingered it.
> >
> > Yes, you're not the first to dislike it (including me).
> >
> > pg_receivelogical? Protest now or forever hold your peace.
>
> I had proposed pg_recvlogical
I still find it wierd/inconsistent to have:
* pg_receivexlog
* pg_recvlogical
binaries, even from the same source directory. Why once "pg_recv" and
once "pg_receive"?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services