> As I suggested in the reply to Simon, I think that the change of FPW
> should be WAL-logged separately from that of HS parameters. ISTM
> packing them in one WAL record makes XLogReportParameters()
> quite confusing. Thought?
I updated a patch for what you have suggested (that the change of FPW
should be WAL-logged separately from that of HS parameters).
I want to base on this patch if there are no other opinions.
Regards.
--------------------------------------------
Jun Ishizuka
NTT Software Corporation
TEL:045-317-7018
E-Mail: ishizuka.jun@po.ntts.co.jp
--------------------------------------------