Quoting Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> On fre, 2010-07-02 at 14:07 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
>> So if IS CONTENT were
>> to be implemented, to determine that you have something that is
>> malformed
>
> But that's not what IS CONTENT does. "Content" still needs to be
> well-formed.
>
What I was hoping to achieve was to determine that something wasn't a
document and wasn't content, however as you pointed out on the bugs
thread the value must be XML. My mistake was not checking that I had
followed the definitions all the way back to the root. What I will do
instead is implement the xml_is_well_formed function and get a patch
out in the next day or two.
Thank you Robert and Peter for tolerating my stumbles through the standard.
Regards,
--
Mike Fowler
Registered Linux user: 379787