Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201006041504.03218.andres@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL (Jon Schewe <jpschewe@mtu.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote: > Some interesting data about different filesystems I tried with > PostgreSQL and how it came out. > > I have an application that is backed in postgres using Java JDBC to > access it. The tests were all done on an opensuse 11.2 64-bit machine, > on the same hard drive (just ran mkfs between each test) on the same > input with the same code base. All filesystems were created with the > default options. > > XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish > ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish > ext3: 15 minutes to finish > ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier differences. ext4 uses barriers by default, ext3 does not. Andres
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: