Re: Tuple storage overhead
От
Peter Bex
Тема
Re: Tuple storage overhead
Дата
Msg-id
20100416101327.GF11616@frohike.homeunix.org
Ответ на
Re: Tuple storage overhead (Szymon Guz)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Tuple storage overhead Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Szymon Guz <mabewlun@gmail.com>
Re: Tuple storage overhead Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl>
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:59:38AM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote: > File pages are not fully filled from the start as that could result in bad > performance of queries later. The manual page you linked to says something else: "The fillfactor for a table is a percentage between 10 and 100. 100 (complete packing) is the default." However, the index has a default fill factor of 90, so I guess I can tweak that to 100 to shave off another few percent. (there will be no updates nor extra inserts on these tables) Thanks for the tip! I hope there are more ways to tweak it, though because this doesn't save that much. Regards, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления