Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Дата
Msg-id 20091025224209.GB5516@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Timothy Madden escribió:

> Anyway Posgres offers a CREATE FUNCTION statement that resembles or should
> resemble that in the standard, and that is what I am talking about.

"Should" being the operative word in that sentence.  If you want to
submit a patch to move us closer towards the SQL/PSM goal, I'm sure it
will be welcome.

> I just want the Postgres version of the statement to look more like
> the standard one.

Sure.  If we weren't all pointing in that general direction, we would
probably have CONNECT BY instead of WITH RECURSIVE.

> Would you detail the differences you talk about that you see here ?

I'm not that familiar with SQL/PSM, sorry.  Pavel Stehule is da man.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Timothy Madden
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Следующее
От: Timothy Madden
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?