Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200904211630.n3LGUbA09550@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> > \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions
> > \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe:
>
> \df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
>
> Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might
> be adequate.
Agreed. The problem is I don't see curly braces used anywhere in \?,
but now that I look at it it is just because there is no need for them.
How about this:
\\df{antw}[S+] [PATRN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions
In a way though, they are really still optional, they are just not
optional for this specific line.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: