renaming "storage parameters"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема renaming "storage parameters"
Дата
Msg-id 20090209171902.GC2870@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: renaming "storage parameters"  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: renaming "storage parameters"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: renaming "storage parameters"  (Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Euler Taveira is arguing in an autovacuum thread that we should give
"storage parameters" a different name; his argument is that
"autovacuum_enabled" is not really a parameter that relates to storage.
He is proposing "relation parameters".

I am against the idea of renaming them, for two reasons: 1. it's a
user-visible change that doesn't seem to buy a lot; 2. it's a tedious
patch to write.

Can I get some votes?  If you think they should be renamed but to a
different name than "relation parameters", please state what that is
too.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables