Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20090129022734.GC8123@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert,
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> pg_security (which I really think out to be renamed to
> pg_selinux_context or something, and make a new table if we someday
> support Trusted Solaris or whatever).
Err, this doesn't really make sense if we're doing row-level security,
that's not something which is tied to SELinux or Trusted Solaris. Of
course, it's likely we'll need such a pg_selinux_context table or
something too.. Or maybe pg_security can be pg_rls instead. Just
wanted to avoid confusion over this point.. Assuming Peter's approach
is the path that is generally agreed upon by core..
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: