Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Scara Maccai <m_lists@yahoo.it> writes:
> >>> I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any
> >>> errors,
> >>
> >> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> >> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> >> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a
> >> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> >> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.
>
> > Is this a TODO? Seems so.
>
> I think it's just a minor bugfix, but if you want to put it in TODO for
> a day or two, go ahead...
That's fine --- I will just push it to the patches queue so we know it
is a live issue.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +