-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:13:53 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> I am having trouble locating the previous thread - can someone please
> point me at it?
I am having trouble finding one that makes a cohesive argument against
but here we go:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2000-05/msg00215.phphttp://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-04/msg00952.php
Of course there are tons of results of users wondering why we don't
offer such as simple and useful feature.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHu2ayATb/zqfZUUQRAmL7AJoCQyNmbLIbZNXG9JjMQu2ax/vRJQCfcevF
TF6TzTSr/1ep8PuSNMcGK2g=
=bFqN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----