Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench
Дата
Msg-id
200711051636.lA5GaLG06414@momjian.us
Ответ на
Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench (ITAGAKI Takahiro)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: BUG #3681: fillers are NULL in pgbench Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
This has been saved for the 8.4 release: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > "ITAGAKI Takahiro" writes: > > > All of filler fields in branches, tellers and history is NULL. It is > > > probabbly a mistake because there are fields of char(22-88) in the table > > > definitions. > > > TPC-B requires at least 100 bytes per row for all tables used in it. > > > > I'm not in favor of changing this. pgbench has never pretended to be > > "really" TPC-B, nor has anyone ever tried to compare its numbers against > > other TPC-B numbers. On the other hand, people *do* compare pgbench > > numbers to itself over time, and if we make a change like this it will > > break comparability of the results. > > Ok, I feel it reasonable. > The attached is a patch to mention it in the source code. > > Regards, > --- > ITAGAKI Takahiro > NTT Open Source Software Center > [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Greg Sabino Mullane
Дата: