Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?
Дата
Msg-id 200710180813200000@1403217259
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > I'm writing up the new GUCs, and noticed that max_prepared_transactions 
> > defaults to 5.  This is too many for most applications (which don't use them 
> > at all) and far too few for applications which use them regularly.  
> 
> I think the intention was to have enough so you could test 'em (in
> particular, run the regression tests) without eating resources for
> the majority of installations that aren't using them.
> 
> Certainly an installation that *is* using 'em would want a higher
> setting.

Can' we make the default 0, which is what the majority should want, and have the regression test explicitly set it up
onthe commandline?
 

/Magnus



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Release notes introductory text
Следующее
От: "Jacky Leng"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal when WALarchiving is enabled