Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200606271618.k5RGINR27070@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
PFC wrote: > > > My idea is that if an UPDATE places the new tuple on the same page as > > the old tuple, it will not create new index entries for any indexes > > where the key doesn't change. > > Basically the idea behind preventing index bloat by updates is to have > one index tuple point to several actual tuples having the same value. > The idea is not to avoid index bloat, but to allow heap reuse, and having one index entry for multiple versions of an UPDATEd row is merely an implementation detail. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: