Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martijn van Oosterhout
Тема Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Дата
Msg-id 20060627161318.GE16840@svana.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?  (Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba@sraoss.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:45:53AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> No, it says it occurs if this condition is met: "A single *send* call or
> *WSASend* call fills the whole underlying socket send buffer."
>
> This will surely be true if the buffer sizes are the same. They
> recommend making the socket buffer at least 1 byte bigger.

Ok, but even then, are there any benchmarks to show it makes a
difference. The articles suggests there should be but it would be nice
to see how much difference it makes...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Rocco Altier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC