Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] }
> >     ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT
> >     EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments )
>
> And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were
> modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that
> you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables.

Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a
tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole
set to the trigger.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mark Woodward"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Следующее
От: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?