Re: merge>hash>loop

On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:22:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> > Actually, if you run with stats_block_level turned on you have a
> > first-order approximation of what is and isn't cached.
>
> Only if those stats decayed (pretty fast) with time; which they don't.

Good point. :/ I'm guessing there's no easy way to see how many blocks
for a given relation are in shared memory, either...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461