Added to TODO:
* Experiment with multi-threaded backend better resource utilization
This would allow a single query to make use of multiple CPU's or
multiple I/O channels simultaneously.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Browne wrote:
> mstone+postgres@mathom.us (Michael Stone) writes:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 01:21:23PM -0500, Chris Browne wrote:
> >>A naive read on this is that you might start with one backend process,
> >>which then spawns 16 more. Each of those backends is scanning through
> >>one of those 16 files; they then throw relevant tuples into shared
> >>memory to be aggregated/joined by the central one.
> >
> > Of course, table scanning is going to be IO limited in most cases, and
> > having every query spawn 16 independent IO threads is likely to slow
> > things down in more cases than it speeds them up. It could work if you
> > have a bunch of storage devices, but at that point it's probably
> > easier and more direct to implement a clustered approach.
>
> All stipulated, yes. It obviously wouldn't be terribly useful to scan
> more aggressively than I/O bandwidth can support. The point is that
> this is one of the kinds of places where concurrent processing could
> do some good...
> --
> let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
> http://cbbrowne.com/info/spiritual.html
> Save the whales. Collect the whole set.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +