Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2006 at 10:31 pm, in message
> <200602100431.k1A4VlY21635@candle.pha.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian
> <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > OK, I got it working. The fix is to add GUC_REPORT to guc.c for
> > standard_conforming_strings. See the same flag on
> > session_authorization. That will cause libpq to see any changes made
> to
> > that variable. Sorry I didn't know that detail before.
>
> Fantastic! I added that flag on my end, and everything I've tried is
> working perfectly, except: I found that I didn't get my "expected" file
> 100% right with my hand-crafted attempt. You're probably already on
> that, but just in case it might save you a few minutes -- attached is a
> good patch for the "expected" file to go with the new regression test
> script for strings.
>
Oh, what I normally do is to look at regression.diff, and if that looks
OK, I just apply it to the expected file like this:
cd expectedpatch < ../regression.diff
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073