Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
| От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20051112185139.GE571@svana.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:44:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > > If we don't like imposing link time constraints, we could require > > people to include: > > > #ifdef PG_MAGIC_BLOCK > > PG_MAGIC_BLOCK; > > #endif > > I was hoping to avoid forcing source-code changes, but something like > that might be the best solution. Anyone think it's unreasonable? Alternativly, you could make it optional for a release (print warning that magic block wasn't found). Next release require it. It's a small enough change that it wouldn't require huge amounts of effort on the part of module writers. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: