Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruno Wolff III
Тема Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
Дата
Msg-id 20051025032039.GB16642@wolff.to
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PG Killed by OOM Condition  ("John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>)
Ответы Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition  (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 23:03:06 +1000, John Hansen <john@geeknet.com.au> wrote:
> Good people,
> 
> Just had a thought!
> 
> Might it be worth while protecting the postmaster from an OOM Kill on
> Linux by setting /proc/{pid}/oom_adj to -17 ?
> (Described vaguely in mm/oom_kill.c)

Wouldn't it be better to use sysctl to tell the kernel not to over commit
memory in the first place?


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] 'a' == 'a '
Следующее
От: Qingqing Zhou
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance