Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Fuhr
Тема Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?
Дата
Msg-id 20050704042928.GA60958@winnie.fuhr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?  (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>)
Ответы Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 08:15:07PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> 
> Michael, the result is, you can make them all STRICT.

OK.  Does anybody else have thoughts on removing the PG_ARGISNULL()
checks?  Neil suggests removing them because they'd be unnecessary,
but I'm concerned about people who'd use the new code with old
catalog entries that aren't STRICT (e.g., restored from a dump).
Should we leave the PG_ARGISNULL() checks in place as a safety
measure, or should the 8.1 Release Notes make it clear that the
functions need to be recreated (or pg_proc updated)?

-- 
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Oliver Jowett
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HEAD doesn't cope with libraries in non-default locations
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?