Re: buildfarm issues
От | Jim Buttafuoco |
---|---|
Тема | Re: buildfarm issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050304202803.M66820@contactbda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: buildfarm issues (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew, A couple of things, 1. we need to develop a matrix of systems/os/compiler to see what coverage we do have and compare it to the INSTALL guide. 2. the run_build.pl should be changed to keep the information on the system to date (and have the matrix in 1 change) 3. have the run_build.pl script check the build farm CVS to see if there is a new version of the build farm code and either download and/or alert the owner of the system I am able and willing to help out in all of the above. I am also willing to help fill the gap in systems if needed. I have been using perl for over 10 years now (since perl 4 days) and have been doing web/postgres coding for the last 6 years. Let me know what I can do to help Jim ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> To: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com> Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:28:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm issues > Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > > >On Friday 04 March 2005 10:11, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > > >>Now that we've been running for a while there are a few buildfarm issues > >>that I need to address. > >> > >>First, do we keep the right data about the members? Essentially, we > >>keep: <operating_system, os_version, compiler, compiler_version, > >>architecture>. For Linux, we genarlly ask for the > >>Distribution/distro-version instead of the OS/os-version. However, that > >>lead to interesting situations - Gentoo for example is so "flexible" > >>that in version 2004.03 you might easily be using kernel version 2.4.x > >>or 2.6.x ... in fact it's almost impossible to tell what might be > >>installed on a Gentoo system, or how it was compiled. So I'm really not > >>sure how we should treat such systems. > >> > >>Second is the fact that systems change over time. People upgrade their > >>machines. I'm considering a facility to allow people to change the > >><os-version,compiler-version> aspects of their registered personality - > >>these will become essentially timestamped pieces of information, so > >>we'll still be able to tie a set of values to a history item. > >> > >> > > > >What about using uname(1), cc -v, etc to glean this information and post it > >with each event logged? I belive you have all this stuff already in the > >config.log that is used already ? > > > > > > See previous para - on Linux we want the distro name and version, not > "Linux" plus kernel version. uname doesn't seem to help much there. > Also, I have no idea how portable cc -v is. Can we guarantee to have the > compiler version properly identified on every platform? > > cheers > > andrew > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq ------- End of Original Message -------
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: