Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Ah, the problem was introduced here:
>
> Right, it was my fault.
>
> > The problem is that the PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL call was moved
> > below the printf 64-bit tests.  This commited patch moves
> > PGAC_FUNC_PRINTF_ARG_CONTROL which is after we know AC_TRY_RUN works and
> > just before printf 64-bit args are tested.
>
> This patch breaks things in a different way: you should not have moved
> the AC_LIBOBJ(snprintf) step.  Also you randomly placed the arg-control
> test between a chunk of code and the comment describing same.

Thanks.
--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073