Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> Could I suggest that we re-work the TODO list slightly, with regard to
> mentioning the ANSI SQL standard?
>
> As of last count, we have 14 items listed which would take PostgreSQL
> into full SQL:2003 Core conformance. Troels Arvin has recently listed
> some of these as "low hanging fruit" in the recent thread about SQL
> conformance related patch,
>
> Some SQL:2003 features are mentioned in other parts of the TODO list,
> though we don't refer to whether these are Mandatory or Optional (e.g.
> MERGE is Optional). ISTM that it would be useful to group the Mandatory
> ones together into a new section of the TODO list: "SQL:2003 Core".
>
> I'm aware that a number of those are possibly deliberately not
> supported, in which case, we could mention those in brackets or simply
> leave them off the list etc..
Yes, we could create a new section or add SQL:2003 identifiers as part
of the description for certain items.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073