Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Please remove that; if I thought either one was a good idea, I would
> > have allowed it in the committed patch.
> >
> > Sequences are too small to be worth moving around, and may someday be
> > reimplemented in a fashion that doesn't use up a separate disk file for
> > each one. If we allow SET TABLESPACE on them we will be limiting our
> > future flexibility for no useful gain.
>
> Why do we allow them to be created in tablespaces in the first place
> then? Seems like a bit of a misfeature? I mean we don't allow views in
> tablespaces...
True, that does seem unusual.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073