Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
| От | Martin Marques | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200306121005.08056.martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user (Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb@eskimo.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user | 
| Список | pgsql-general | 
On Mié 11 Jun 2003 12:29, Jonathan Bartlett wrote:
>
> 3) If your point was to move to a relational database, then you should
> choose Postgres.  MySQL, although it's SQL, hardly qualifies as
> relational
MySQL doesn't have relations at all, unless you put the InnoDB module,
which stamps down performance.
An example I tried to do on a MySQL without InnoDB was:
CREATE TABLE testing (
id INT,
word VARCHAR(20) REFERENCES other_table("word")
);
(knowing that other_table exists (I prefiously created it) and has word as
a VARCHAR(20) field).
An error is what I got.
--
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués                  |        mmarques@unl.edu.ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA |       Centro de Telematica
                       Universidad Nacional
                            del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
		
	В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: